11 posts tagged “movies”
The Pianist is an all-round winner in that it deals with a horrifying and very serious theme, yet is beautifully and aesthetically crafted. The scenes flow smoothly into each other and at no point did the film come close to being boring or tedious. It's an absolute treat to watch.
Hats off to Toshiro Mifune (who plays the role of Akama, or Rogozhin in the original Russian novel) for his stellar acting. I couldn't take my eyes off him whenever he appeared. In fact, I'm amazed by the uniformly excellent acting of the entire cast. Not only did Kurosawa make the right choices, but he evidently brought out the best in them as well.
The Idiot is a very difficult novel to bring to life by way of cinema. As such, the film does seem to simplify the storyline to a great extent, and that is perhaps its single shortcoming, as inevitable as such a simplification is. But for fans of Kurosawa and anyone interested in high-quality art films, this, in my opinion, is very unlikely to disappoint.
I've also just started on Entourage. The first episode of Season One seemed ok -- not particularly enthralling. Maybe it gets better as you go along?
Video: What is your favourite children's movie?
Submitted by I-Luv-Eeyore.
None of today's newer kids' movies even come close to these. Such music and magic and excitement.
That a 2 1/2 hour film depicting the events of a short period in time should manage to be engrossing throughout is a pretty big achievement. Nifty editing, some great acting, and a commendable reconstruction of the atmosphere of 1945 make this a delight for anyone even half-interested in European history.
(With subtitles in English.)
Danny Vinyard's sad summing up of what he learned from his skinhead experience is undoubtedly my favourite line in the film:
Hate is baggage. Life is too short to be pissed off. It's not worth it.
I agree.
So -- Mystic River, which I watched tonight, boasts of the involvement of huge names like Sean Penn, Kevin Bacon and Clint Eastwood. Unfortunately, at the end of the film, I was left asking: "So what?!" The acting is fabulous, don't get me wrong, but the movie sort of crumpled in on itself as it tried to handle lots of complex themes and pose as a very profound piece of cinema. It's not, really. The innate talent of the actors saves it, but the storyline, while it might have been exciting in the original novel, didn't really have me engrossed or concerned as to what would happen next.
Sean Penn: a master of the trade, if there ever was one. But he's just a part of the movie, not the whole of it. I didn't like this one much.
I'm usually wary of movies that "make you think," because as often as not they turn out to be ponderous and preachy, but this one is thought-provoking, engrossing, and fast-paced. It has enough food for thought for hours and hours of coffee-table discussion and is a straightforward, unafraid exegesis of the international politics of war. Viewer beware though, I found the combination of Jared Leto and Ethan Hawke on screen insanely distracting from the storyline. Hghm.
Not much to say about 2001 except that the Star Gate scenes are absolutely terrific. For a movie made in 1968 the effects are probably better than any that would be employed today. And it's hard to make a science fiction movie that doesn't look corny or plastic; I guess it needed a Kubrick to pull this one off. Incredible amalgamation of art and science fiction -- though I wonder why I unwittingly seemed to have subscribed to the notion that they are worlds apart. Now it seems but natural that it should all link up Kubrick-style. The music, the acting (Kubrick really does bring out the best in his cast -- every movie of his I've watched stands out for the actors' relaxed body language and unaffected dialogue delivery. It probably helped that he usually had a good cast to work with), and that amazing ability to create hair-raising suspense before the viewer has even realised it's building up... I guess you need to watch this one to understand what I mean.